<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Relusional” Christian Reads Atheist’s Book</title>
	<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/</link>
	<description>Religion, Music, Art, Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: winstoninabox</title>
		<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-274</link>
		<author>winstoninabox</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>And a little investigation did find this:
http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,981412,00.html

Ugh. I'd have to agree with Chris Mooney:
http://www.csicop.org/doubtandabout/brights/
"Bright" is just a poor choice of word. Better luck with the re-rebranding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a little investigation did find this:<br />
<a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,981412,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,981412,00.html</a></p>
<p>Ugh. I&#8217;d have to agree with Chris Mooney:<br />
<a href="http://www.csicop.org/doubtandabout/brights/" rel="nofollow">http://www.csicop.org/doubtandabout/brights/</a><br />
&#8220;Bright&#8221; is just a poor choice of word. Better luck with the re-rebranding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winstoninabox</title>
		<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-270</link>
		<author>winstoninabox</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I don't recall in the book Mr Dawkins suggesting that athiests refer to themselves as 'Brights'. I do recall him writing about the, "'The-Brights.net' (an American initiative to rebrand atheists as 'Brights' in the same way as homosexuals successfully rebranded themselves as 'gays'" (Page 380 Paperback Edition Black Swan 2007). Of course you could be talking about some other book, interview or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall in the book Mr Dawkins suggesting that athiests refer to themselves as &#8216;Brights&#8217;. I do recall him writing about the, &#8220;&#8216;The-Brights.net&#8217; (an American initiative to rebrand atheists as &#8216;Brights&#8217; in the same way as homosexuals successfully rebranded themselves as &#8216;gays&#8217;&#8221; (Page 380 Paperback Edition Black Swan 2007). Of course you could be talking about some other book, interview or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren</title>
		<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-254</link>
		<author>warren</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>There's something SO ugly about the way athiests think they're just so much smarter than everyone else.   Vaulting ambition that o'er leaps itself.

W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something SO ugly about the way athiests think they&#8217;re just so much smarter than everyone else.   Vaulting ambition that o&#8217;er leaps itself.</p>
<p>W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-172</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mine certainly was and I agree that Richard's probably was not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mine certainly was and I agree that Richard&#8217;s probably was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Kaite]]></title>
		<link>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-94</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Kaite]]></author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://michaelkrahn.com/blog/2007/04/28/%e2%80%9crelusional%e2%80%9d-christian-reads-atheist%e2%80%99s-book/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>'Relusion' - finally, something even more toe-curling than Dawkins suggesting that all we atheists refer to ourselves as 'Brights'. Unfortunately I suspect your tongue was at least partly in cheek, and his was not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Relusion&#8217; - finally, something even more toe-curling than Dawkins suggesting that all we atheists refer to ourselves as &#8216;Brights&#8217;. Unfortunately I suspect your tongue was at least partly in cheek, and his was not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
