There are two topics that Christians are known to obsess over and spend much of their lives refuting and then promoting their own interpretation of: eschatology and evolution. I’ve never spent much time on either one, but I got to thinking about creation and evolution last night and I wrote some notes. What I present here are thoughts about why I haven’t spent my life trying to prove or disprove various theories.
In both cases, I think God is free to act as he chooses. Whatever the ultimate truth is about these two issues, I don’t expect it to change the course of my everyday life very much.
I believe in God. I believe that he had a hand in creation. However he chose to act in the process is fine with me.
I believe in Jesus. I believe that he was the Son of God, that he lived on the earth, that he was crucified and came back to life, that he ascended into heaven, and that someday he will return in like manner.
I already live – and will continue to live – in the light of the hope of these two beliefs.
I am not threatened in the least by the prospect of the majority of the theory of evolution being proven to be true. One of my favorite authors, Madeleine L’engle, when asked what she thought about creationism versus evolution, said:
“‘I can’t get very excited about it. There’s only one question that’s worth asking, and that is, did God make it? If the answer is yes, then why get so excited about how?’
As far as I can see, evolution seems to be more logical at this point. I really don’t think God put fish and skeletons of fish in the mountains of Nepal to test our faith. But if I should find out tomorrow that it was neither creationism nor evolution, that wouldn’t affect my faith because it’s a peripheral issue.
The main issue is, did God create it? That’s all that matters.”
That sums up my feelings on the issue rather well.
Questions:
If you believe in a literal reading of the creation story, how can a literal, 6-day creation roughly 6000 years ago be reconciled with a fossil record that indicates that life began long before that?
If your belief is based on modern Darwinism (that non-living matter became living matter and eventually became life as we know it today) how do you account for the lack of transitional evidence in the fossil record?
That should be enough to get us started.
Extra reading:
Can You Believe in God and Evolution?
Mark Driscoll’s sermon notes on creation and evolution theories
P.S. I still think Edgar’s post is a good one, but perhaps it’s not in a format that encourages discussion.




