Talking about music is like dancing about architecture… Rotating Header Image

May, 2009:

Francis Schaeffer: “Aping the world’s wisdom…”

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_P8QVEpbcBTg/Ry4YTJes2GI/AAAAAAAAAVE/k4-xKGN6QRo/s400/fs.bmpFrom a recent Crossway Books blog post:

Schaeffer’s following summary paragraph has been especially important (and convicting) to me and something that I pray will always be foundational to the work we do at Crossway.

“Is it not amazing,” Schaeffer writes, “though we know the power of the Holy Spirit can be ours, we still ape the world’s wisdom, trust its form of publicity, its noise, and imitate its ways in manipulating men! If we try to influence the world by using its methods, we are doing the Lord’s work in the flesh. . . . The key question is this: as we work for God in this fallen world, what are we trusting in? To trust in particular methods is to copy the world and to remove ourselves from the tremendous promise that we have something different — the power of the Holy Spirit rather than the power of human technique.”

Searching for Donald Miller

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51-0-ash-YL._SL500_AA240_.jpgI think Donald is one of, if not THE brightest of “our” writers. Blue Like Jazz: Nonreligious Thoughts on Christian Spirituality deserves a place on the highest shelf of that genre… I’m thinking of Madeleine L’engle and Anne Lamott here… and maybe a bit of P.J. O’Rourke. Honestly, Blue Like Jazz changed a few parts of my life, and that ain’t hyperbole.

However, I was equally disappointed with Searching for God Knows What. You know how musicians who are Christians are saying things like “Hey, I’m not an authority on stuff. I just write and sing about living my life as a Christian. Don’t hold me up to be higher that you.”? I feel like Don turned that around in SFGKW. He’s a great writer, but in that book he tried to be a theologian and the effect was just the opposite of BLJ. He came off as an arrogant, left-of-liberal theologian instead of the regular guy reflecting on life experiences he was in BLJ.

I can tolerate a lot of theology that doesn’t match my own in a work like BLJ, or Lamott’s Traveling Mercies, or any number of L’Engle’s books. What I find hard to stomach is a writer like Don trying to be definitive on matters in which he is not an expert. I’m not either, BTW.

“Write what you know”, right? Either that or explore what you don’t know humbly and with an open mind.  Don repeatedly uses analogies about marriage, raising kids, and to a lesser extent sports to make his theological points. In those first two categories he has no experience on which to draw – which isn’t to say those categories are completely off-limits for him.

So I found myself writing in the columns of the book a number times – writing things like “Hey Don, try this line of reasoning again after you’re married and see if it still rings true to you” and “Hey Don, get back to me once you have some kids and have thought through this in real time.”

I guess the annoyance was exacerbated by the fact that I loved BLJ so much.

Sorry for riffing on Don so much. Its been a blog post sort of waiting to happen so I guess this was my rough draft.

What is “worship”?

http://tirehillcob.com/b_w_worship.jpgLet’s try to separate music from the idea of worship for a while.  We’ll talk about it a little bit at the end.

Worship as a noun
1. The feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity : the worship of God
2. The acts or rites that make up a formal expression of reverence for a deity; a religious ceremony or ceremonies : the church was opened for public worship.

Worship as a verb
1. Treat (someone or something) with the reverence and adoration appropriate to a deity
2. Take part in a religious ceremony

Like many English words, the meaning and usage of the word “worship” has taken a few turns.  In its earliest use it was used in reference to God but then it became a less religious word and was used to describe anything virtuous – like a home or a town.  In all cases it was still indicative of the “worthiness” or “worthship” of a person or thing to be ultimately honored.

As Christians, we believe that only God is ultimately worthy of our highest affections, and so that is the context in which we will discuss worship this morning.

Worship as a Living Sacrifice

Before sin entered the world, finite man and infinite Creator were in a harmonious relationship. God created us with a desire to worship – that is, a desire to call something worthy above ourselves.  This desire still exists in every human being, child of God or not.

Because of this, there is no question about whether we will worship; we will, the question is “What will we worship?” Worship is the seeking out and admiration of that which we perceive to be greater than ourselves.

To the Christian, worship must be telling God how much he is worth and showing how much he is worth to us in the actions of our lives.

Worship and Idolatry

A proper understanding of worship must also include an understanding of idolatry. If worship is the acknowledgment that God is the only worthy recipient of our highest affections, then it’s opposite – idolatry – is every action we take or word we say that contradicts that belief.

Idolatry is not just another sin, it is the underlying root cause of all sins. Just as Jesus told the woman at the well that worship would no longer take place only in set places at set times, now too idolatry is loosed from its definition as people worshiping a graven image. Now, idolatry happens any time we indicate by action or word that something is of greater worth than God.

Martin Luther pointed out that the first two commandments (1. No other Gods 2. Do not make an idol) refer to idolatry and then the other eight commandments refer to more specific things like murder and adultery and stealing and lying.  Luther proposed that if you never broke the first two commandments, you would never break any of the others.

Whatever commandment you break, whether it’s a problem with sexuality or stealing or lying, the sin itself is not the problem.  The underlying cause is that you are an idolater.

Elements of Worship

Some common word pairings:

“Worship service”

-    What is the “service” that happens in a worship service? “Service” is the action of helping or doing something for someone. How does this happen in a typical Sunday morning gathering?

-    What is distinct about when we gather on a Sunday morning is not that we are worshiping, but that we are worshiping together in order to build each other up.
-    Does every element of the service contribute to the worship of God?
-    Worship is more than what we do in a worship service; it emerges from our entire being, it indicates what hope our hearts are set on. If on God, then worship is true and gives joy; if on anything other than God, it is robbing from God and leads to misery.

“Place of worship”

-    Is this the church building? -    Jesus tells the woman at the well in John 4:

21 “Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father. 22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 But the hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is seeking such people to worship him. 24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”

-    In the OT worship was associated with times and rituals and places.  In the NT it is for the people of God at all times and in all places – how we live IS our worship! No longer is worship tied up with the sacrifice of animals, now it is ourselves that we must sacrifice, we are to become “living sacrifices” as it says in Romans 12.
-    If what we call “worship” only happens inside the walls of our church buildings we have done a poor job as leaders. If the only time we can be bothered to give all the praise and honor that is rightly due to God is for one hour on Sunday morning, well, that says a lot about our priorities.

“Worship leader”

Having established what “worship service” is and what and where the “place of worship” is, and having defined worship itself as the living, continuous, sacrificial acts of a child of God that affirm a stated belief that only God is worthy of ultimate honor, what then does it mean to be a worship leader?

In many churches this is the term used for what is actually a song or bandleader.

Who is a worship leader?

Just like the question “Who will worship?”, the answer is EVERYONE. Whatever or whomever you have decided is most important to you – you give your time, your energy, your money, your love, your devotion, your hopes, your dreams, your fears to that person or thing – THAT is what you worship. Today, you might lead the worship of Nascar, or your favorite TV show, or your favorite band.

As soon as you place something in the highest place of your affections, above God you are going to sin, you are going to walk into a trap that you set for yourself.

Anyone who is an example of putting God first in their life, of showing that God is the thing of most worth in their life is a worship leader. When we sing, “I will give you all my worship…” do we understand what we’re saying? “I will give you, God, all of my notions of worth. Above my job, my spouse, my money, my car, my family… I think you are more worthy of my attention than any of those things!”

Music

So what is the place of music? Why do we equate “worship” with “music”? I think its because the culture (and we along with it) worships music.  For an obvious example: American Idol. Could we make our intentions any clearer than that?!

Music can open a place in the heart where a door is closed. It may be for just a minute or two, but when that place is open, Christ can come in, pain can go out, sin can be revealed, anger and doubt – sometimes hidden even from their possessor – are seen and are dealt with.

I believe that this is the power of music, both for good and for bad.

In addition to music, various descriptions of corporate worship in scripture include the following:
-    Corporate prayer
-    Reading of scripture
-    Preaching based on scripture
-    It is linked with gathering to eat
-    The singing if songs that praise God and encourage one another
-    Giving to the poor
-    Public confession of faith
-    The receiving of God’s blessing
-    Response to praise and prayer with the saying of “Amen”
-    Baptism and communion
-    Prayers of thanksgiving and the breaking of bread

Challenge

Worship is our proper response to God, ascribing all honor and worth to Him because He is worthy.  “In other words,” says D.A. Carson in the excellent work Worship by the Book, “worship becomes the category under which we order everything in our lives.” (p46)

Genuine worship is loving God with heart and soul and mind and strength, and showing what a statement like that means in the daily decisions of life.

How will you lead in the worship of God today?

Our Destiny is Certain and Secure

“There is nothing that is so calculated to promote holiness as the realization that we are heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, that our destiny is certain and secure, that nothing can prevent it. Realizing that, we purify ourselves even as He is pure, and we feel that there is no time to waste. That is the way to live the Christian life!

Do not turn it into a law, but realize that you have received the Holy Spirit. Then work out this theme. Your Father is watching over you. He is looking after you – yes, let ms use scriptural language – He is jealous concerning you because you belong to Him. You belong to Christ, you are His brother. The Holy Spirit is dwelling in your very body and you are destined for glory.”

- Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Spiritual Depression (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman’s Publishing Co., 2002), 174.

Twitter Retention Rate

Twitter.com Nielsen, the same people who do TV ratings, recently noted that more than 60% of new Twitter users fail to return to the site the following month.

Judging Twitter retention by how many people “visit the site” is like judging Dominoes Pizza by how many people dine-in.

It’s true that like blogging and any other social media, a lot of people try it and the many quickly give up. And with the explosive growth recently you have to expect a good number of window shoppers.

But Twitter is unique in how open it is, allowing users to interact from unlimited points of access without ever having to go to Twitter.com.

So judging retention by how many people are regularly visiting a site works for Facebook and MySpace (because you have to go there to do anything), it’s kind of apples-to-oranges to apply the same criteria to Twitter.

Follow me on Twitter here.

Review: Shane Hipps – Flickering Pixels

Marshall McLuhan began his 1964 book Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, with the following:

“In a culture like ours, long accustomed to splitting and dividing all things as a means of control, it is sometimes a bit of a shock to be reminded that, in operational and practical fact, the medium is the message.”

For nearly a half-century now, students of media have been contemplating the repercussions of McLuhan’s statement.

In Flickering Pixels: How Technology Shapes Your Faith, Shane Hipps attempts to apply McLuhan’s thinking to the realm of faith.  Hipps seems doubly qualified to tackle the content – a former ad exec for Porsche, Hipps turned his back on the lucrative career, entered seminary, and became a Mennonite Pastor.

Hipps writes with excellent pacing, clear prose, and a good bit of humor. Unfortunately, in this book at least, his focus is lacking at times and nonexistent at others. Entire chapters (although they are short) are devoted to issues that have no relation to the topic of the book at all. The first ten chapters, in fact, are a fascinating application of McLuhan’s ideas. After that, however, more chapters than not add nothing to the stated purpose of the book: awareness of the effects of technology on our faith.

In chapter 11 Hipps turns his focus to social media – in his terms “virtual community” – which he claims “inoculates people against the desire to be physically present with others in real social networks”.  It’s at this point that Hipps loses me. He attacks everything from blogs to instant messaging to Facebook and relegates them to the status of cotton candy.

While his concerns are well heeded, in some portions of the book Hipps fails at being a student of modern media and instead becomes a reactionary critic against it.

He describes the digital shorthand of today’s teens as “an invisibility cloak to adult eyes” and “a deliberate teen encryption method,” claiming that, “those who learn it become like medieval scribes, hoarding scrolls containing sacred information.” I can barely resist responding with “LOL.”

“Slang,” McLuhan says in the introduction to Understanding Media, “offers an immediate index to changing perception… The student of media will not only value slang as a guide to changing perception, but he will also study media as bringing about new perceptual habits.”

The main idea of the chapter is that internet technology reverses the order of familial authority by granting young people “startling and unprecedented freedom…the digital space is a land without supervision.” This is proven, but his analysis and prescriptions are flawed. To parents struggling to balance digital boundaries with their simultaneous desire avoid their kids being left out or left behind, Hipps reminds them that “digital space is the most anemic form of social interaction available,” before saying, “maybe being left out of this is a good thing.”

While I take no issue with boundaries and parental authority, if parents are actually capable of keeping their kids entirely free of the damaging effects of social media, surely then a more nuanced and moderate approach is also possible. Similar prescriptions were no doubt giving with the advent of other now common technologies; the automobile for example enabled young adults (and their passengers) to easily travel further from parental supervision than previously possible, where they could get into who-knows-what kind of trouble.

While I sympathize with Hipps’ concerns over the separating effects of technology, I cannot take the view that these technologies should be shunned. I cannot endorse the view – nor do I find if verifiable from personal experience – that these technologies intrinsically “inoculate(s) people against the desire to be physically present with others in real social networks”.

Digital community can be an enhancement and a supplement to flesh-and-blood community. Hipps has taken the tack of using the habits of the immoderate and abusive to prove that the thing abused is to blame – the same strategy that in previous generations failed at eliminating the moderate consumption of alcohol among Christians.

Sin is still at the root of all abuse and addiction, and faith in Christ and reliance on the Holy Spirit is still the only solution.  Creating an awareness of this fact is what will steer both adults and young adults into appropriate and moderate use of their digital resources.