Talking about music is like dancing about architecture… Rotating Header Image

January, 2010:

Rescuing Worship

This week I reached a bit of a milestone. The appearance of a column entitled “Rescuing Worship” marks my first work published in a nation-wide publication – in this case, “Christian Week”. I will be doing a series of these posts throughout 2010 under the column heading “Worship Matters” (apologies to Bob Kauflin).

Here are the first few paragraphs. You can read the rest at the home page for my Worship Matters column here.

Rescuing Worship

Let’s reclaim “worship” as much more than a concert

By Michael Krahn  |  ChristianWeek Columnist

If you walk into almost any evangelical church and inquire about “worship,” you can expect to be directed to someone who leads music. “No, no,” you might say, “I’m looking for the people responsible for planning corporate worship at this church.” But it’s a lost cause.

In most churches, the battle is already over: music equals worship; worship equals music. The capacity to differentiate between the two is functionally non-existent. The “worship leader” is the person who leads the group of musicians we call the “worship team.” When these people are on the stage we’re worshipping; when they’re not we’re doing something else. Simple, right?

You may hear comments like, “After the worship, we’ll hear a sermon.” But if the sermon only begins after worship has left the building, we may as well head home before it starts.

This odd hegemony of music—not as one aspect of worship, but as worship itself—is a fairly recent construct. I believe it is a destructive trend in the modern church. What gave the music the right to demand so much?

Read the rest here.

Vulnerable and Authentic (Bailey Book Study – Part 3)

These posts will be a series of study notes and questions for the book that our Life Group is studying together. The book is “Upsidedown” by Tim Bailey. You can read a review of the book and order it here. Feel free to read along and join the discussion in the comments section below. The content for these questions is found on pages 26-30.

Vulnerable and Authentic: Let’s Get Real…

In this section of the book, Bailey makes some challenging, and perhaps even frightening, statements about vulnerability:

“Vulnerability has not been known as a positive word in our culture. It is a battle word used to depict weakness. Yet in community, vulnerability becomes the essential catalyst.”

Have you had an experience in which you tried to be vulnerable and it backfired? How about when you tried to be vulnerable and it turned out well?

“Without vulnerability, you surrender yourself to a life of never being loved by anyone.” Rather than seeing vulnerability as something by which you will be taken advantage of, you must see it as the only way to being loved.

Is this statement true?

“Vulnerability is simply allowing others to ‘see’ the person you and God know. It is leaving the protection of yourself to someone else.” When we embrace vulnerability, we are give others power. They may take what we’ve told them and tell others, causing great damage to both our reputation and our confidence.

Examples anyone?

Authenticity:

“As we allow people to access who we really are and engage in the messiness of intimacy, we discover community.’

“Authenticity isn’t avoiding hypocrisy – it is admitting it.”

In order to be truly authentic, you have to admit that you are a hypocrite. “Authenticity is revealing the ‘you’ that God knows – mess and all.

How do you respond when someone accuses you of being a hypocrite? In what ways are we all hypocrites?

Books. Books? Books!

(One caveat: the answer to many of these is of course “the Bible”)

1. One book that changed your life:
Thoughts In Solitude” – Thomas Merton
Not because it was the best book of his that I read but because it was the first of his that I read.

2. One book that you’ve read more than once:
I read books thoroughly once. I underline, highlight, dogear, and review… so I rarely read them in their entirety twice. I believe the only book I have read twice is John Grisham’s “The Partner

3. One book you’d want on a desert island:
The Bible

4. One book that made you laugh:
Parliament of Whores: A Lone Humorist Attempts to Explain the Entire U.S. Government” – P. J. O’Rourke followed closely by
Blue Like Jazz” – Donald Miller
In the “One book that made you laugh, even though it wasn’t trying to be funny” category:
“The Great Emergence” – Phyllis Tickle.

5. One book that made you cry:
Two-Part Invention: The Story of a Marriage” – Madeleine l’Engle
Autobiography of the saddest kind: the loss of a life-long partner in marriage. l’Engle’s writing always gets to the heart very quickly, but never more quickly than in this book.

6. One book that you wish had been written:
The one I’m working on.

7. One book that you wish had never been written:
I generally like books… they are my friends… and even the bad ones are usually good for a laugh.

I wish Douglas Coupland hadn’t written “Microserfs“… because he’s capable of so much better and Serfs only had a few good sections…

I wish Phyllis Tickle hadn’t written “Great Emergence, The: How Christianity Is Changing and Why“… because it was too short for its topic and laughable for its historical synopsis  and prophecies for the future.

I wish Donald Miller hadn’t written “Searching For God Knows What“… because Don writes memoir very well and theology very badly

8. One book you’re currently reading:
The Jesus You Can’t Ignore: What You Must Learn from the Bold Confrontations of Christ” – John MacArthur
I’ve never read an entire book by JMac before. It is exactly what I expected; great section bookended by unnecessarily confrontational hyperbole.

9. One book you’ve been meaning to read:
Cross of Christ” – John R. W. Stott

10. One book you own that you’re pretty sure you’ll never read:
I have a huge biography of Adolph Hitler that I doubt I’ll ever read.

Copy these into the comment section and leave your answers:

1. One book that changed your life:

2. One book that you’ve read more than once:

3. One book you’d want on a desert island:

4. One book that made you laugh:

5. One book that made you cry:

6. One book that you wish had been written:

7. One book that you wish had never been written:

8. One book you’re currently reading:

9. One book you’ve been meaning to read:

10. One book you own that you’re pretty sure you’ll never read:

D. A. Carson: The Sheep, The Goats, and The Least of These

For those of you who aren’t aware (I wasn’t until last week), renowned theologian and scholar D. A. Carson posts regularly on his blog at The Gospel Coalition website. Carson’s blog is called “For the Love of God“. The blog provides little commentary on current events and controversies but is instead more like a running commentary on scripture. This is quite refreshing in a landscape of current events commentators (myself included).

In a recent post, Carson comments on Matt. 25:31-46 (questions for discussion at bottom):

THE PARABLE OF THE sheep and the goats (Matt. 25:31-46) focuses attention on the hungry, the thirsty, the naked, the sick, and those in prison. It speaks volumes to us in a culture where the poor, the wretched, and the unfortunate can easily be ignored or swept aside to the periphery of our vision. Here Jesus, the Son of Man and the King, declares, “I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me” (25:40; cf. v. 45). Doesn’t this mean that somehow when we serve the wretched we serve Christ? Doesn’t this then become a distinguishing mark — perhaps even the distinguishing mark — of true followers of Jesus Christ?

That, at least, is how this parable is usually interpreted. At one level I am loath to challenge it, because it is always important for those who know and follow the living God to show their life in God in the realms of compassion, service, and self-abnegation. Certainly elsewhere the Bible has a great deal to say about caring for the poor.

But it is rather unlikely that that is the focus of this parable. Another ancient stream of interpretation has much more plausibility. Two elements in the text clarify matters.

First, Jesus insists that what was done by the “sheep,” or not done by the “goats,” was done “for one of the least of these brothers of mine” (25:40; cf. v. 45). There is overwhelming evidence that this expression does not refer to everyone who is suffering, but to Jesus’ followers who are suffering.  The emphasis is not on generic compassion (as important as that is elsewhere), but on who has shown compassion to the followers of Jesus who are hungry, thirsty, unclothed, sick, or in prison.

Second, both the sheep and the goats (25:37, 41, 44) are surprised when Jesus pronounces his verdict in terms of the way they have treated “the least of these brothers of mine.” If what Jesus is referring to was compassion of a generic sort, it is hard to see how anyone would be all that surprised. The point is that it is Jesus’ identification with these people who have (or have not) been helped that is critical — and that is a constant feature of biblical religion. For example, when Saul (Paul) persecutes Christians, he is persecuting Jesus (Acts 9:4). Real followers of Jesus will go out of their way to help other followers of Jesus, not least the weakest and most despised of them; others will have no special inclination along these lines. That is what separates sheep and goats (25:32-33).

So how do you treat other Christians, even the least of Jesus’ brothers?

This priority on good treatment of other Christians is stated elsewhere in scripture, such as Galatians 6:10 where it says: “So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.”

Are you comfortable with this principle?

How does it play out in everyday life?

Do we avoid these type of interpretations because they might cause us to be be seen as catering to “club members”?

Mural and Portrait Artist: Pete Siemens

If you are looking to have a large mural painted or a portrait sketched, I must recommend the work of artist Pete Siemens.

Below are some samples of his work. You can see more of his work at his site found here.

Contact Pete at psiemensart@yahoo.com or call (519) 691-6814.

This is one of my favorites – a wall painting that is also a fully-functioning clock (click to see larger version)

Engagement Portrait

Child Portrait

Amazing Full-Wall Hand-Painted Murals (click on pictures to see larger size):

Contact Pete at psiemensart@yahoo.com or call (519) 691-6814

Emerging Church Remembered Fondly by Dan Kimball

Thanks to TSK, the Emerging Church is now dead. TSK says that it was like that when he got there, but the investigation is still underway.

But move on we must, and we now enter the era of reflecting on the good and bad of the movement… like Dan Kimball does here as he reflects on 10 good things that came about as a result of the movement:

1. Friendships developed amongst many who thought they were alone and going crazy.

2. A recognition the church is not connecting with emerging generations and a shared urgency developed to do something about it.

3. Safe places to ask questions were formed – and a strong interest in theology not just methodology developed.

4. The contemporary church has made changes to where it often looks like what was being done in young adult ministry 10 years earlier.

5. There has been a refreshing reevaluation of how tight we held onto certain minor theological or denominational differences and ceasing what we used to argue about. But at the same time, all the more solidifying our historical orthodox Christian faith and core doctrines and unifying together on those.

6. There has been a correction made to the reductionist form of the gospel we were using that focused only about the afterlife and making a “decision” -  and not about mission, justice and compassion in this life. But as much as we now focus on justice and compassion in this life – we still cannot ever forget about the reality of eternal heaven/hell.

7.  There has been a healthy rise of attention for having both orthodoxy and orthopraxy in the life of a disciple of Jesus.

8.  There has been an interest in exploring why we do what we do in the church and if the origins are from Scripture or from tradition. Tradition for tradition-sake must never get in the way of mission.

9.  Youth pastors stopped wearing mullets. Goatees were adopted, but at least they were better than mullets.

10.  There has been a healthy rise of the church “being the church” instead of “going to church” – and that the church is seeing itself more as being sent into the world on mission.

Speaking of the Emerging Church like a dead relative may be difficult for some, but the time has come to say farewell.

Christian Death Metal: The Message of the Medium

Like a good Christian music listener, you look at lyrics before you listen to music. Good for you. This of course keeps us all safe from “bad” music, right?

Let’s be blunt: to think that a lyric alone is what makes a song bad or good defies reason. After all, the whole point of a song is that it brings  words and music together. In particular, to think that a song is “good” if it mentions Jesus – and even BETTER if it mentions Jesus 5 times! – and “bad” if it doesn’t will only suffice as a method of discernment if you are the most extreme type of binary thinker.

For example, your 17-year-old son sends you an email one day asking if you will allow him to listen to the following song. You read the lyrics, and to your surprise you can sing along as you read (or so you think):

O Lord my God! When I in awesome wonder
Consider all the works thy hand hath made,
I see the stars, I hear the mighty thunder,
Thy power throughout the universe displayed;
Refrain:

Then sings my soul, my Saviour God, to Thee,
How great Thou art, how great Thou art!
Then sings my soul, my Saviour God, to Thee,
How great Thou art, how great Thou art!

“Praise God!” you say, “That boy has got a good head on his shoulders.”

By that method – which, believe me, MANY people use – the basic rule of discernment for a Christian parent is illustrated:

Basic Rule of Discernment:

Regardless of the style in which these lyrics are sung, we have no choice but to give this song a “thumbs up”.

This is the thinking that has ruled for some time now, as long as Christian parents have sought to be discerning about the music that enters their homes via their teenagers.

Now, take a listen to music that accompanies the above lyrics:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I think you’ll agree that the first 40 seconds are quite pleasant. After that, I imagine it’s a split decision. The above song is by a band called “Becoming the Archetype”, whose musical genre is best described as “Christian Death Metal”. By the way, If you think about Stryper when you hear the words “Christian” and “Metal” together, you need to stop wearing spandex – we’re a long way there my friend.

But back to the point – the big question is this: Does the delivery method affect the message? You can make this point in a live setting (which I did with our Youth last summer – it was quite amusing) by doing the following:

1. Choose a volunteer (It’s important that they don’t know about it ahead of time)

2. In your most pleasant voice and while patting the person on the back, say something like “Joel, I’m going to do you a favor!”

3. Observe the emotional and physical response of the volunteer. Mine was quite pleased. Hey, who doesn’t want someone to do them a favor?

4. Reset the stage.

5. Now say the same thing except scream it at the top of your lungs, have a very angry look on your face, and lunge at the person as if you’re going to strangle them.

This works perfectly to illustrate what the phrase “The medium IS the message” is all about. When I smile and pat you on the back while offering to do you a favor, you probably think the favor is going to be something good; when I scream those words and lunge at you, you probably think the opposite.

Let’s apply this to musical style: Does the style or method in which words are delivered have any effect on the message they communicate? It’s obvious from the example above that is does. Is something different communicated when the lyrics to “How Great Thou Art” are wrapped in a musical style like that of the above song? Yep. But what is it? And what is the difference between what is communicated by those lyrics delivered by Becoming the Archetype as opposed to, say, Randy Travis singing them over a soft bed of slow Country Gospel?

Unfortunately, at this point I can’t offer you a new magic bullet matrix of discernment; I can only say that the old “lyric-only”, binary “Mentions Jesus=good / Doesn’t Mention Jesus=bad” method has to go.

One more thing… It would be enormously dishonest of me to omit the following confessions: I really like this type of music (although not this band/song in particular… since it is both derivative and cliche). I listened to it when I was younger, and I still do occasionally. I can honestly say that it emboldened my faith – at whatever level of maturity I was at when I was in my late teen years.

Far from seeing metal music as indecipherable noise (which, ok, some of it is), I see it as music requiring much musical skill, many hours of practice, and a lot energy to pull off.

In fact, sometime in the next couple of months I plan on putting up a series of posts on the history and current state and varied sub-genres within the metal genre.

The above observations are not those of someone who “doesn’t understand” what’s involved or who shakes his head and says “those crazy kids – they’ll grow out of it.”… Au contraire – I have been in real mosh pits (not happy jumping clubs like kids go to now); I spent years of my life immersed in these styles, albeit in the Christian versions of them; some of my best friends are in great metal bands (and of course, they’re going to comment on these thoughts, right guys?)

So don’t get defensive…or angry.

Discipline – (The Medialle House Journals – 6)

***This is a series of posts based on writing I did on personal retreat in October 2009. Read earlier posts in the series here: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 |Part 5|Part 6|Part 7***

I have become accustomed to constant self-expression. Twitter, Facebook, Blog – these are outlets for me, channels of expression unavailable just a few years ago. And come to think of it, in those years I spent a lot more time on spiritual development via certain disciplines like journaling, prayer, and fasting. There was no outlet for the resulting thoughts and reflections at all other than the occasional long and engaged discussion with someone by email.

Now though, we put these thoughts out there, available to be seen by (potentially) the eyes of hundreds of millions of people.

God used those disciplines at that time to lead me to grow in the ways I needed to grow. Now, he has led me to a place where I often lead and teach others and most of that teaching was accomplished via those disciplines

Of course, this is no reason to neglect the disciplines – even if now he chooses to use different ones.

It’s like telling someone you have a good marriage because you got married. There’s more to it than having “made the leap”; there’s daily nurture, daily commitment and, if we remain committed, much reward and much growth.

Remaining disciplined or getting married might be a good start, but it takes a lot more than a day, a ceremony, a ring, and a cake to have a good marriage. A marriage is something you have to work at every day, and so too is a relationship with God.

Late Night Wars: Jay, Conan, and Dave

I can’t stay awake to watch any of the late night shows but I have seen them from time to time. I have always thought Leno was by far the weakest of the three. I like Conan, but I think Letterman is the best. Here is Letterman explaining the current late night upheaval as only Letterman can:

Anxious, Joyful, and Offended

“We have no reason to be anxious, every reason to be joyful, and fewer reasons than we think to be offended.”

I only started reading Kevin DeYoung a few months ago but he is quickly making his way to the top of my reading priority list. In this recent post titled “Why Are We So Offended All The Time?” he delivers a meditation on being offended:

Offendedness is just about the last shared moral currency in our country… We don’t discuss ideas or debate arguments, we try to figure out who is most offended… Whenever someone makes a public gaffe, whether real or perceived, critics storm the microphones to let the world know how offended they are. Why is everyone in such a hurry to be hurt?

***

We live in an emotionally fragile culture. We are in touch with every hurt past, present, and perceived. We are the walking wounded and we want everyone to know. Which is too bad, because when people are genuine victims–profoundly, egregiously wronged–they deserve not to be lumped in the same category with those who got picked last for kickball or turned down for their church’s “special music.”

***

As Christians, we worship a victimized Lord. We should expect to suffer and should have particular compassion on those who hurt emotionally and physically. But we do not resemble the Suffering Servant when we take pains to show off our suffering… if we are misunderstood or even reviled let’s not go after short-lived and half-hearted affirmation by announcing our offendedness for the world to hear. Every time we try to make hay out of misplaced calumnies, we hasten the demise of Christianity in the public square. As offendedness becomes the barometer of acceptable discourse, we can expect further marginalization of Christian beliefs.

These are excerpts – read the whole thing here