For those of you who aren’t aware (I wasn’t until last week), renowned theologian and scholar D. A. Carson posts regularly on his blog at The Gospel Coalition website. Carson’s blog is called “For the Love of God“. The blog provides little commentary on current events and controversies but is instead more like a running commentary on scripture. This is quite refreshing in a landscape of current events commentators (myself included).
In a recent post, Carson comments on Matt. 25:31-46 (questions for discussion at bottom):
THE PARABLE OF THE sheep and the goats (Matt. 25:31-46) focuses attention on the hungry, the thirsty, the naked, the sick, and those in prison. It speaks volumes to us in a culture where the poor, the wretched, and the unfortunate can easily be ignored or swept aside to the periphery of our vision. Here Jesus, the Son of Man and the King, declares, “I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me” (25:40; cf. v. 45). Doesn’t this mean that somehow when we serve the wretched we serve Christ? Doesn’t this then become a distinguishing mark — perhaps even the distinguishing mark — of true followers of Jesus Christ?
That, at least, is how this parable is usually interpreted. At one level I am loath to challenge it, because it is always important for those who know and follow the living God to show their life in God in the realms of compassion, service, and self-abnegation. Certainly elsewhere the Bible has a great deal to say about caring for the poor.
But it is rather unlikely that that is the focus of this parable. Another ancient stream of interpretation has much more plausibility. Two elements in the text clarify matters.
First, Jesus insists that what was done by the “sheep,” or not done by the “goats,” was done “for one of the least of these brothers of mine” (25:40; cf. v. 45). There is overwhelming evidence that this expression does not refer to everyone who is suffering, but to Jesus’ followers who are suffering. The emphasis is not on generic compassion (as important as that is elsewhere), but on who has shown compassion to the followers of Jesus who are hungry, thirsty, unclothed, sick, or in prison.
Second, both the sheep and the goats (25:37, 41, 44) are surprised when Jesus pronounces his verdict in terms of the way they have treated “the least of these brothers of mine.” If what Jesus is referring to was compassion of a generic sort, it is hard to see how anyone would be all that surprised. The point is that it is Jesus’ identification with these people who have (or have not) been helped that is critical — and that is a constant feature of biblical religion. For example, when Saul (Paul) persecutes Christians, he is persecuting Jesus (Acts 9:4). Real followers of Jesus will go out of their way to help other followers of Jesus, not least the weakest and most despised of them; others will have no special inclination along these lines. That is what separates sheep and goats (25:32-33).
So how do you treat other Christians, even the least of Jesus’ brothers?
This priority on good treatment of other Christians is stated elsewhere in scripture, such as Galatians 6:10 where it says: “So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.”
Are you comfortable with this principle?
How does it play out in everyday life?
Do we avoid these type of interpretations because they might cause us to be be seen as catering to “club members”?
More From The Ascent to Truth
- The “Gay Christian Network” and Philip Yancey – Talking about music is like dancing about architecture…
- The Kingdom of God and The Kingdom of this World – Talking about music is like dancing about architecture…
- Are Isa and Jesus the Same Person? The Rick Warren-Inaugural Prayer Redux – Talking about music is like dancing about architecture…
