Talking about music is like dancing about architecture… Rotating Header Image

March, 2010:

Flee the Coming Google Privacy Apocalypse!!! Or Don’t…

In the video below you’re led through the labyrinth of online services that is Google. At first it seems like any other business profile, but about halfway through the music turns from business-profile-cheery to conspiracy-tinged-ominous…


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7yfV6RzE30

Google… wants to now where you are… what you buy… what you’re reading…. Google wants to own the cables and the electricity to power them.

Google bigshot Eric Schmidt is quoted as saying: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” Oh my! How dare he suggest that? He must be off his rocker. Is he trying to start some brave new cult of transparency and integrity?

Drumroll Please…

But that’s not all… Are you ready to hear the great atrocity Google is positioning itself to commit? What nefarious surprise is this predatory beast waiting to spring upon us – the innocent, unsuspecting public? Here it is: “Google wants to know who you are, where you are, and what you like so it can target ads at you!”

Advertising. A-HA!

Shocked? Dismayed? Ready to run for shelter?

No? Me neither.

This, the narrator would have us believe, is the worst possible way that Google can violate its own “Don’t Be Evil” ethos.

What is laugh-out-loud funny about this argument is that the worst-case scenario for the Google apocalypse is “God help us all, they want to try to sell us things we like!”

Apparently we are a society of servile consumers, void of the ability to choose, with a capacity for fear-stricken compliance unmatched except in a beaten dog.

I can hardly imagine a worse fear: Please don’t show me an advertisement! Whatever you show me, I’ll have to buy! Please, please, please – STOP! I have no control!

“Completely spineless, robot-brained consumers…”

If you are such a completely spineless, robot-brained consumer, you shouldn’t even own a computer, let alone access the internet on it. It’s doubtful you should even be permitted to carry a wallet without supervision.

In the end we are told to be concerned about this Darth Vader evil of a company not because it is attempting to index every movement of humanity for some immoral purpose, but because it might find out enough about us to show us advertising about products we’ll probably like – and be too weak to resist.

Advertising is effective, no doubt, but are you comfortable being cast as a drone that, with involuntary compulsion, buys whatever is put before you?

The last time I checked, before advertising succeeds it requires a willing participant to remove his wallet from his pocket, find some form payment, and fork it over to a merchant.

Here’s a video that makes a better case for concern:

Contradictions (The Medialle House Journals – 12)

This is part of a series of posts based on writing I did on personal retreat in October 2009. Read earlier posts in the series here:
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 |Part 5|Part 6|Part 7|Part 8 |Part 9|Part 10|Part 11

“Contradictions have always existed in the soul of man. But it is only when we prefer analysis to silence that they become a constant and insoluble problem. We are not meant to resolve all contradictions but to live with them and rise above them and see them in the light of exterior and objective values which make them trivial by comparison.” - Thomas Merton

Oh, how many seekers stumble along this path. Either knowingly, as an excuse to never really get anywhere, or unknowingly, trapped in the age of scientific reason where everything must be reducible to “fact” in order to attain that status.

Consider these paradoxes: We have choice, yet we are chosen before time; God hardens the hearts of some, yet they are still responsible for their sins. These paradoxes cannot be reasoned away, though many have tried. We simply live with them.

What then are the “exterior and objective values” that make these paradoxes trivial by comparison? That God is good is certainly one of them. However much an atheist might mock the seeming simplicity of such a position, it is indeed the one we hold to as believers. We do not understand all that God does, but we trust that from his perspective it is both right and good.

In Isaiah 30:15 God says, ”In repentance and rest you shall be saved; in quietness and trust shall be your strength.” We are not meant to question everything without end, nor will we ever understand all his ways.

If we could, we would be God and he would not and we would all be in a lot of trouble.

The Rage Against God – An Interview With Peter Hitchens

Peter (whose more famous brother is Christopher) has a book coming out with Zondervan.

(HT: Doug Wilson)

Andrew Jones responds: “John Piper and an ‘upper-middle-class’ emerging church”

Andrew Jones (Twitter), a recognized long-time leader in Emerging Church circles responds to my post from earlier this week. Here is an excerpt:

The EC leaders John Piper has met are, most likely, upper-middle-class people with Seminary degrees and salaries and mortgages and new cars so I can see why he would say that. But in fact the opposite is true, esp. when you look at the global movement, and I find the statement quite insulting to the many EC leaders who have given up their comfortable salaried pastoral positions in the traditional church (like I did) for the downwardly mobile lifestyle of ministry among the postmodern generation and in new forms of church where a salary is unheard of and probably not even considered. Most EC leaders cannot afford to attend Seminary, and nor can they get time off from their job at Starbucks to attend Christian conferences where people like John Piper and the upper-middle-class tiny minority of EC hang out.

Has the emerging church movement, as popularized by the American publishing industry and Christian conference business, degenerated from a grass-roots renewal movement, reforming voice, missional conscience and sustainable church planting movement to a theological discussion for an upper-middle-class Seminary grads with too much time? Well, thats another question.

You can read the rest of Andrew’s post here and join the conversation or jump into the conversation already underway on my post here.

Prosperity Theology vs. Poverty Theology

I love finding little nuggets of clarity. The idea of either the poor or the rich being more naturally virtuous has been a point of discussion in my current classes on the life of Christ. In the book Doctrine, Dr. Gerry Breshears says:

    Much of the teaching about stewarding one’s treasure is prone to either poverty or prosperity theology. Poverty theology considers those who are poor to be more righteous than those who are rich; it honors those who choose to live in poverty as particularly devoted to God. Conversely, prosperity theology considers those who are rich to be more righteous than those who are poor; it honors those who are affluent as being rewarded by God because of their faith. In fact, both poverty and prosperity theology are half-truths because the Bible speaks of four ways in which treasure can be stewarded. (Doctrine, pg. 388-389)

He then goes on to list four types of stewards, all of which are represented in scripture:

  1. Righteous rich stewards – Biblical examples of righteous rich stewards include Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Job (both before and after his life tragedy and season of poverty), Joseph of Arimathea (who gave Jesus his personal tomb), Lydia (who funded much of Paul’s ministry), and Dorcas (who often helped the poor).
  2. Righteous poor stewards – Biblical examples of righteous poor stewards include Ruth and Naomi, Jesus Christ, the widow who gave her mite, the Macedonian church, and Paul, who often knew want and hunger.
  3. Unrighteous rich stewards – Biblical examples of unrighteous rich stewards include Laban, Esau, Nabal, Haman, the rich young ruler, and Judas Iscariot.
  4. Unrighteous poor stewards – Biblical examples of unrighteous poor stewards include the sluggard and the fool, who are repeatedly renounced throughout the book of Proverbs.

Remembering these four categories will ensure our pronouncements for or against either poverty or prosperity are moderated by the light of scripture.

John Piper: the Emerging Church was “an upper-middle-class, white, departure from orthodoxy…”

***UPDATE – Andrew Jones responds to this post***

Piper’s new definition of the Emerging Church: an “upper-middle-class, white, departure from orthodoxy…”

Some highlights from the video:

- “The Emerging Church is a very loose designation for a constellation of people, churches, and movements that are resistant to and rebelling against the excesses of mega-churches and how artificial, plastic, and non-relational they feel.

And they want to have relationships be everything and therefore they minimize doctrine, because doctrine divides and relationships pull together. And there’s all kinds of experimental ways of doing church and all kinds of experimental ways of doing spirituality.”

He’s throwing a bit too much into the pot here – for example, we SHOULD be rebelling against the excesses of the modern mega-church.

- The EC is a fading reality that has seen its best days. I think you will not even hear the term “Emerging Church” in 10 years – I think it will be over and gone.

Agreed. I think a consensus has been established over the last few months, even among those who are recognized as leaders in the movement. (See Andrew Jones and Dan Kimball)

- It’s leadership is in shambles (Piper could give “horrible specifics” from personal lives that aren’t public yet). Immorality is rampant.

I could comment here as well, but I won’t.

- Mentions McLaren’s latest book and that even Scot McKnight – the Anabaptist professor, Jesus Creed writer, and former supporter of Emergent Village – has thrown the towel in on McLaren.

- Prioritizing relationships over truth leads to heresy, whereas if truth is prioritized you get relationships thrown in. If relationships are prioritized and truth doesn’t get thrown in, it’s lost, and then the relationships are ruined.

Generally true, but the nature of the prioritization is important. If the “prioritization of truth” takes the form of judgment and immediate exclusion for non-conformity, then it’s no better than the opposite. He would have done better to say “prioritize truth WITH love”.  Simply yelling the truth at someone isn’t going to foster relationship.

At any rate, it’s quite an inflammatory video. What do you think?

Trusting God – Ongoing Trust

Yesterday – Initial Trust

There is another type of trust that is often neglected – ongoing trust. This is the trust that must be exercised by everyone who has placed their faith and trust in God initially. This is the trust that we must recommit ourselves to daily as believers in God and followers of Jesus Christ.

Revival Meetings

Allow me to digress for a moment and say that periodically I hear of a desire for what we used to call “revival meetings”. Now I’m not opposed to those meetings; I think they can be useful, but I think what we miss when we see that as the solution to perceive spiritual deadness is that revival and recommitment are supposed to happen every day.

Every morning should start for each of us with the acknowledgment that without Christ we are spiritually dead and that if we are to live, on this day, we will require the assistance of the Spirit of God. So what is needed is not a periodic explosion of mass recommitment, but a daily taking up of one’s cross to follow Christ.

This, I would argue, will yield more committed followers of Christ.

All You Need Is… Trust

Many of us, myself included, often live as though that initial trust is all that’s needed, that this one-time commitment is the pinnacle of our spiritual lives. And it is VERY important of course, but ongoing trust is required and acts as proof that our initial trust was sincere. Because if we claim that we trust him but we haven’t done so since that once time long ago, then do we really trust him?

So this might be the time when you place your trust in God for the first time – and I will rejoice with you if that is the case. And I will be equally happy if those of you who long ago placed your initial trust in God would today confess that there are many examples in your life that betray the fact that you don’t trust him every day. I know there are in mine. There are days, sometimes weeks, when the eyes of my heart seem to think that something other than Christ is my savior.

Initial trust and ongoing trust – these are both acts of extreme humility because trusting God means admitting that there are things we don’t know, and I for one am pretty bad at that. I plan and scheme and execute and follow-up and analyze, all in an effort to tame the unpredictable, to reduce the possibility of surprise happenings.

And all of my humility is required for me to come before God and say “God, I may know something about what’s happening in my tiny corner of the universe, but I have no clue, nor the ability to discern or to tame or to process or to analyze the immensity of your providence and your sovereignty. Help me. I want to trust you.”

Trusting God – Initial Trust

I want to assure you that trusting God is an immensely sane thing to do. We distrust him because we project human attributes onto him, and every one of us has some cause to distrust other human beings.

I want to be clear about this, we will never understand all of the purposes of God, but trusting him has proven the right thing to do for everyone who has ever truly trusted him.

There are of course at least two ways in which we speak of trusting God.  One is an initial trust and one is an ongoing trust.

Initial Trust
We know this initial trust by various names like “giving your heart to Jesus” or “becoming born again.” All of these phrases are useful, even though we understand that they’ve been overused and lost some of their original meaning. But the point is that these are all the same thing, whether you call it “giving your heart to Jesus” or “becoming born again” or “coming to Christ”, these are all ways of saying the same thing: trusting in God, through Jesus Christ for your present and your future.

It means we stop and admit that we don’t do a very good job at making a meaningful life when left to ourselves. It means that we trust that God has a purpose to everything around us and we trust him to bring about that which, from his divine, sovereign, and all-knowing perspective, is pleasing to him, even though we won’t always understand.

If you have never trusted God in this way, you have an opportunity to do so. The invitation is open. In fact, he is calling you at this moment to put your trust in him. And here’s one way you can make the most of that opportunity:

Pray to God and put your trust in him. If you’re not sure how to do this, send me an email and I’ll help you out. My email address is michael.krahn@gmail.com

It is important is that you answer the call of God today.

Tomorrow : Trusting God – Ongoing Trust

Book Review: “The Gospel According to the Son” by Norman Mailer

In my quest to immerse myself in the life and teachings of Christ I intend to read and watch a few works that don’t synchronize with the Gospel accounts.

One such work is The Gospel According to the Son by Norman Mailer. As you can guess from the title, this is a fictional first-person account of Jesus’ own life. The Jesus who narrates this account is attempting to correct falsehoods, exaggerations, and half-truths included in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in order to enlarge their own folds.

After such a start, there is not much to be said for the rest of the book. The Jesus offered in Mailer’s narrative is a doubting, sinning, slightly above-average human with some suspicion that he might be divine. The Jesus offered us here is in many ways the opposite of the one presented in the synoptic Gospels; he has traces of the divine but is mostly human.

God is pictured as limited in His love, and if superior to Satan at all, only in that he is slightly more cunning.

The book was a bit if a labor to finish. It is certainly undeserving of the accolades included on its cover: “A staggering work”, Bold… daring”, “A triumph”.

It is none of the above – not in craft or literary quality. It is rather some parts of the Gospel texts interspersed with Mailer’s conjecture about what happened before and after.

And I suppose that not really unique; we all do this to an extent. What we fill in with conjecture merely betrays our biases.

Review – “A Million Miles in a Thousand Years” by Donald Miller

screen-shot-2009-09-29-at-94510-am.pngReading “A Million Miles…” is like talking to an old friend, one you used to love and spend a lot of time with but for whatever reason haven’t seen for a long time. This friend used to captivate you and you would enjoy being in their presence so much you wondered if you were smothering them (sometimes you probably were). But in the years between then and now you’ve forgotten just how warm and exciting being with them was.

When I sat down to read A Million Miles in a Thousand Years: What I Learned While Editing My Life I had fond memories of Donald Miller’s surprise best-seller from a few years ago, Blue Like Jazz: Nonreligious Thoughts on Christian Spirituality (see my blog posts about it here). By the time I was 20 pages in, I remembered BLJ as that old friend, one that I forgotten I loved so much. One that made me laugh out loud in public places, despite my best efforts to appear completely sane. One that had changed my life in a few ways.

Review continued below…

Want a free copy of A Million Miles in a Thousand Years by Donald Miller?

Here’s how:

  1. Subscribe via email or feedburner (please leave a comment below and let me know you did this)
  2. Retweet this post by clicking here.

All names will be entered into a spreadsheet and the winner will be chosen at random via Random.org. Contest closes Friday March 26, 2010. The winner will be announced after confirming their mailing address. Best of luck and thanks to all who enter!

And it makes sense that I was so reminded of BLJ because “A Million Miles…” is mostly about BLJ. It’s about the book, and how Miller’s life was changed by the success of the book and how – which is most exciting for an artist – his life was positively affected by his own art.

The best thing about this book and BLJ is that they throw you into a torrent of self-reflection with the strangest of motivation. There are no commands here, no guilt trips, just Don Miller taking a brutally honest look at his own life and writing about it. And somehow this inspires us to do the same. We see the character making progress, we see his life improving as he very intentionally crafts his own story and we know that this is also possible for us.

“Perhaps one of the reasons I’ve avoided having a clear ambition is that the second you stand up and point toward a horizon, you realize how much there is to lose.” – Donald Miller

screen-shot-2009-09-29-at-103140-am.png

Searching For God Knows What

Memoirs are such fun to read, and when Miller is writing in memoir mode he is among the greats. When not in memoir mode, however, he can come across as simply another disgruntled Evangelical, as was clearly evident in Searching for God Knows What (blog post here).

In truth, the same theology runs through all of his writing, but in the form of a memoir it seems less agitating. Much like any other friend who has theology I disagree with, in conversational form it is so much more tolerable – actually, it’s enjoyable. It’s like we’re sitting in a room together discussing our differences, each willing to hear the other, each convincing the other on some points, and being convinced on others.

I was pleased to read on p222 Don say “I didn’t say these things, and I’m glad I didn’t, because those are the things people who have never been married say.” Another issue with “Searching For God…” was that he kept saying unwise things that were exactly what only an unmarried non-parent would say. In the margins of my copy of that book I wrote things like “Hey Don, get back to me once you have children and let me know if you still think this is true…”.

A Million Miles…

I digress… “A Million Miles…” is not just an entertaining read, it calls you to a brutal honestly about your life. In the language of the book itself, it calls you to write and then live a better story with your life, while acknowledging that there is a Writer above you also writing your story:

“So as I was writing my novel, and as my characters did what they wanted, I became more and more aware that somebody was writing me. So I started listening to the Voice, or rather, I started calling it the Voice and admitting there was a Writer. I admitted something other than me was showing a better way. And when I did this, I realized the Voice, the Writer who was not me, was trying to make a better story, a more meaningful series of experiences I could live through.” – Donald Miller

Fellow writers/authors will love this book because so much of it is about the process of writing. Others may find his analogies of God as a writer/literary being a bit of a stretch. They are a bit of a stretch, but often, as in this case, the stretch makes the art more powerful.

If you enjoy Miller’s writing and would like to read more in the same vein, his writing is reminiscent of authors like Anne Lamott (read: “Traveling Mercies: Some Thoughts on Faith“) and Madeleine L’Engle (read: “Two-Part Invention: The Story of a Marriage” or “The Irrational Season“) in all the best ways.

One other byproduct of reading Miller’s work: it inspires me to write, which is why this review is getting so long! Well, I reviewed BLJ in six lengthy posts, so one post for this book is actually pretty short.

Want a free copy of A Million Miles in a Thousand Years by Donald Miller?

Here’s how:

  1. Subscribe via email or feedburner (please leave a comment below and let me know you did this)
  2. Retweet this post by clicking here.

All names will be entered into a spreadsheet and the winner will be chosen at random via Random.org. Contest closes Friday March 26, 2010. The winner will be announced after confirming their mailing address. Best of luck and thanks to all who enter!