Below is the full text of my first column for the print publication Christian Week. Below the article are some letters to the editor that came into Christian Week in response to the column.
Let’s reclaim “worship” as much more than a concert
By Michael Krahn | ChristianWeek Columnist
If you walk into almost any evangelical church and inquire about “worship,” you can expect to be directed to someone who leads music. “No, no,” you might say, “I’m looking for the people responsible for planning corporate worship at this church.” But it’s a lost cause.
In most churches, the battle is already over: music equals worship; worship equals music. 
The capacity to differentiate between the two is functionally non-existent. The “worship leader” is the person who leads the group of musicians we call the “worship team.” When these people are on the stage we’re worshipping; when they’re not we’re doing something else. Simple, right?
You may hear comments like, “After the worship, we’ll hear a sermon.” But if the sermon only begins after worship has left the building, we may as well head home before it starts.
This odd hegemony of music—not as one aspect of worship, but as worship itself—is a fairly recent construct. I believe it is a destructive trend in the modern church. What gave the music the right to demand so much?
Concert or community?
Mine is not your grandfather’s diatribe against the dangers of “rock and/or roll.” I’m a big fan of the genre. As a musician and songwriter I write, play and sing rock music. But rock and roll has some handicaps when, as a style, it is applied to Christian worship.
It can drown out the most important element: the human voices of the congregation.
Rock music is inextricably intertwined with concert culture. It calls for big sound, bright lights and lots of juice to run it all. Anything less will be seen as a pale and inadequate.
Rock music isn’t primarily a participatory activity. The crowd might sing along at a concert, but they paid good money to see a performance.
Give people a concert atmosphere, and concert behaviour is what you’ll get.
I’m not proposing we abandon the notion of a designated song leader altogether. But the purpose of a leader is to lead, and I would suggest that if you are a song leader and very few people in your congregation are singing when you lead, something is not as it should be.
So what is worship, then? In his book, Vintage Church, Mark Driscoll defines it as “a response to the revelation of the Lord consisting of both adoration and proclamation of the greatness of God and his mighty works and of serving him by living out his character in gracious service to others.”
Can that include music? Absolutely. But it is so much more. So how can we recover a fullness of meaning? Let me make some suggestions.
What can be done?
Put music in its place. Music is not an inferior element of worship, but it is only one aspect of it. In many churches, the verbal proclamation of the gospel as a determining factor in the quality of corporate worship is secondary to the quality of the music. Every musician should strive for excellence, but when musical genre trumps truthful proclamation, we have an idolatry problem on our hands.
When musical genre trumps truthful proclamation, we have an idolatry problem on our hands.
Win the battle for terminology. Whenever someone calls a musician or song leader the “worship leader,” suggest a better term. Whenever someone says something that narrows the scope of worship to music, draw their attention to that fact. This may be seen as nitpicking, but it does have an effect on how people conceptualize worship.
Redefine the “worship experience.” In modern terms, most people are convinced that they have not “really worshipped” or experienced intimacy with God if there hasn’t been an accompanying emotional high. Of course an emotional high can be part of a worship experience, but to suggest that this is normative or that you’ve failed at worshipping if you haven’t experienced it is ludicrous.
Every time we respond to the revelation of God through word or deed, through adoration or proclamation, through singing or by an act of charity, we are engaging in worship. If you are a leader in your church, it is worth pointing out that every believer is a worship leader.
Surely this recovery is an effort worth causing some discomfort in our churches.
________________________________________
Letters:
1.
Thanks for the great reminder. This continues to be an important discussion for the church. To the model of the rock concert, we could add the model of the theatre, as not necessarily the best [model] for worship. I also like Driscoll’s definition of worship.
Dale Dirksen
Saskatoon, SK
2.
Excellent article by Michael Krahn. I have long believed that we are restricting the term “worship” to the musical performance or concert which occurs in many of our churches, particularly the charismatic and evangelical ones. Our lives as Christians are to be worship to God. All that we do, say, think and influence should be immersed in the idea of adoring, loving and praising our God and Father.
We too easily get caught up in word descriptors and it can be like moving a mountain to change our thinking. Thanks to Michael for challenging what has become an unquestioned, and unexamined, tradition in our churches.
William Hart
Dauphin, MB
3.
This article struck a responsive chord with me. It leads me to think how uncomfortable I am with signs outside many churches announcing “Worship at 10:30″, or something similar. Surely, worship is only part of our service. There’s also Prayers of the People, Preaching, Announcements, Sharing and Fellowship, etc. Some will come, not ready to worship, for various reasons, and yet we still want them to be there. So this is another way in which the term “worship” is used unwisely, and leads to a shallow understanding of the concept. I appreciate your columnist for making us do some soul-searching on this topic.
John Gibson
Seagrave, ON
4.
Micheal Krahn’s insightful essay makes a crucial distinction between music and worship. After decades in Anglican liturgical worship I have spent the past decade in United and Congregational Churches. I notice how much more the liturgical traditions involve the laity in participatory (non-musical) worship. The Collects, Creeds, General Confession, Psalms, readings from both Testaments and the carefully crafted Great Thanksgiving before the Eucharist, and prayers after it, provide all participants with enhanced opportunity to worship God.By contrast, all that is available to Protestants is two or three songs; an address terminated by another song or two and it’s done until next week.
Bert Hopkins
Ottawa, ON
