Talking about music is like dancing about architecture… Rotating Header Image

Prosperity Theology vs. Poverty Theology

I love finding little nuggets of clarity. The idea of either the poor or the rich being more naturally virtuous has been a point of discussion in my current classes on the life of Christ. In the book Doctrine, Dr. Gerry Breshears says:

    Much of the teaching about stewarding one’s treasure is prone to either poverty or prosperity theology. Poverty theology considers those who are poor to be more righteous than those who are rich; it honors those who choose to live in poverty as particularly devoted to God. Conversely, prosperity theology considers those who are rich to be more righteous than those who are poor; it honors those who are affluent as being rewarded by God because of their faith. In fact, both poverty and prosperity theology are half-truths because the Bible speaks of four ways in which treasure can be stewarded. (Doctrine, pg. 388-389)

He then goes on to list four types of stewards, all of which are represented in scripture:

  1. Righteous rich stewards – Biblical examples of righteous rich stewards include Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Job (both before and after his life tragedy and season of poverty), Joseph of Arimathea (who gave Jesus his personal tomb), Lydia (who funded much of Paul’s ministry), and Dorcas (who often helped the poor).
  2. Righteous poor stewards – Biblical examples of righteous poor stewards include Ruth and Naomi, Jesus Christ, the widow who gave her mite, the Macedonian church, and Paul, who often knew want and hunger.
  3. Unrighteous rich stewards – Biblical examples of unrighteous rich stewards include Laban, Esau, Nabal, Haman, the rich young ruler, and Judas Iscariot.
  4. Unrighteous poor stewards – Biblical examples of unrighteous poor stewards include the sluggard and the fool, who are repeatedly renounced throughout the book of Proverbs.

Remembering these four categories will ensure our pronouncements for or against either poverty or prosperity are moderated by the light of scripture.

  • http://www.kloposmasm.wordpress.com Adam Minneapolis

    This is insightful. I’ll admit that I loathe the prosperity gospel in America, but these are excellent thoughts to ponder on and keep in perspective when it comes to this matter.

  • http://www.rootedradical.wordpress.com Jason Postma

    It’s nice to know we have a couple of “white, upper middle class” guys keep us on the straight (literally) and narrow, especially from the excesses of liberation theology and social justice.

  • http://www.michaelkrahn.com/blog Michael Krahn

    Yep. We tend to default to labeling people either 2 or 3. 1 and 4 are rarely used… and any doubt they even exist.

  • http://www.michaelkrahn.com/blog Michael Krahn

    Dang… I forgot to remove the names from the quote. I have to remember to do that so that you can respond objectively to the content of the post rather than disregard it outright because of who said it.

    I’ll try to remember next time.

  • http://www.rootedradical.wordpress.com Jason Postma

    I’m not worried about objectivity – I’m as objective as they are.

    I don’t disagree with their typology – it’s quite helpful.

    I just find the subtitle of the book to be hilarious!

    I hope that they would expand the concept of “stewardship” beyond financial management and salvation beyond a stringent Reformed conception of justification (N.T. Wright is onto something…)

  • http://www.rootedradical.wordpress.com Jason Postma

    An example of Driscoll’s “objectivity” is obvious in his comments to the effect that this book is his “biggest contribution to the gospel of Jesus Christ”…yikes

  • http://www.michaelkrahn.com/blog Michael Krahn

    @Jason Postma: Objectivity: judgment based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices

    Please just look at what’s there and don’t use every post as an opportunity to express your extreme displeasure with the source. IMO that’s no better than when people automatically discount a quote because it’s attributed to Rob Bell or Brian McLaren.

    I do love it when you comment but… I’d like more interaction on content, less on source… please.

    I’m sure there’s stuff in the book that’s over-the-top, lacks grace, etc. but I didn’t quote those parts.

  • http://www.rootedradical.wordpress.com Jason Postma

    I am interacting with the content, albeit to a limited extent since the book ins’t out yet. Again, I don’t deny my unease with certain elements of Driscoll’s theology (and McLaren for that matter). My initial comment was meant to underline a connection between this post and the previous one on Piper and the EC>

    I do think the typology outlined above is helpful, but I hope it doesn’t mean that they are limited the concept of stewardship to financial management – in the Reformed tradition I grew up in, stewardship is creation-wide.

    The use of the language of “righteous” and “unrighteous” implies soiteriology – so I do wonder about how Driscoll and Breshears understand the link between soiteriology and stewardship, especially coming from a Reformed perspective.

    Yes, I understand what objectivity is, but I doubt it is ever possible in its purest, dictionary definition sense. And for that matter, I doubt anyone is ever purely objective. Sure, I suppose it is a goal we can strive for, but it is not something we will ever reach.

    I will play nice…

  • http://joshuaziefle.net/2012/02/06/jesus-likes-poor-people-more/ Jesus Likes Poor People More « Joshua Ryan Ziefle

    [...] moves in the opposite direction.  It sees deep value in rejecting riches and, in the words of one Dr. Gerry Breshears, “…considers those who are poor to be more righteous than those who are rich; it honors [...]